2000 Mules: The Use of Cell Phone Geolocation Data

That data plus the correlated videos prove that Joe Biden is an illegitimate president

Despite media claims to the contrary, the geo-locating of cell phones described in Dinesh D’Souza’s documentary 2000 Mules is accurate and fool-proof evidence of election fraud, and the videos collected and correlated with specific drop boxes and mules cinches the authentication.

Geolocation via cell phone data has been used for years by law enforcement, the intelligence community, and – wait for it – the Centers for Diseases Control. The UK Daily Mail reported on the CDC usage way back in March 2020 at the beginning of the “plandemic”:

The federal government through Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, state and local governments have started reviewing data about the presence and movement of people from certain geographic areas using cellphone data. The data comes from the mobile advertising industry.

The data would … potentially show how much the general public is complying with stay-at-home or shelter-in-place orders, according to experts familiar with the matter.

[As an aside, geo-tracking plus vaccine passports plus a social scoring hierarchy equals a social control system patterned after communist China! This is what the Uniparty seek to implement in the US in direct violation of the US Constitution.]

Law enforcement officers have been using cell phone geolocating data for years. A web search conducted on “law enforcement usage of cell phone geolocating data” results in dozens of articles that provide descriptions of how this is done. Here is an excerpt of one from 2019:

In addition to saving an encyclopedic amount of information about the user, cell phones also leave digital footprints showing where they have been.  Both iPhones and Android based phones have a “frequent locations” feature that will show dates and times that the phone has been at a particular location.

A more common method that police use to find the location of a specific cell phone at a particular time is through information obtained from cell phone towers. A smart phone is constantly communicating with cell phone towers in order to find the strongest signal. The tower that communicates with the cell phone has a limited range.  Therefore, if records show that a specific cell phone was communicating with a specific cell phone tower, then police will know that the cell phone was in the geographical limits of the tower.  This information can place a person's cell phone near the location of a crime or a significant event associated with the crime.  

That and other techniques used were how the FBI was able to quickly arrest J6 protestors within a few short days after the event. Again, what’s the big deal about the 2000 Mules documentary’s use of cell phone geolocating data?

The CDC and federal and local law enforcement agencies have been using cell phone geolocating data for years. Why all the consternation by the Democrat-media complex about 2000 Mules? Because it exposes that Joe Biden was fraudulently elected!

But there is more on the geolocation data front. How do you support Obama was able to launch all those drone strikes against “terrorists” during his presidency? Through the use of geolocation data from cell phones, of course (among other sources of information)! The excerpt below from the CFR blog in January 2017 puts an exclamation on Obama’s use of drone strikes:

The 542 drone strikes that Obama authorized killed an estimated 3,797 people, including 324 civilians. As he reportedly told senior aides in 2011: “Turns out I’m really good at killing people. Didn’t know that was gonna be a strong suit of mine.”

So the Democrats’ little tin god brags about his “drone strike prowess,” and we’re supposed to discredit 2000 Mules because they used the same cell phone geolocation techniques? I don’t think so.

Over time, the CIA’s tracking and locating function transitioned from relying on dedicated tracking transponders and receivers to utilizing the cell system, which tightened the locational data from a 100-meter circle to dead-on within inches. Field operatives have used that pinpoint tracking data to establish video and even audio surveillance of selected targets. This is all normal operations and not at all difficult to achieve. 

Thus, to say that True the Vote was using state of the art geo-locating capabilities that are reliable to the extreme is pretty much a ho-hummer at this point, as the technology has been used for years as described above. Note that all geo-localization data is compounded with time hacks (time hacks are associated with all computerized functions). It is therefore possible to precisely track the movements of individuals over time, and this is exactly what TTV did.

Despite caterwauling by the Democrat-media complex and various leftwing “fact-checkers,” there is nothing wrong in TTV’s approach or interpretation of the collected information. 

Now to use those same capabilities to track the movements of public officials to link them to nefarious activities! Wouldn’t that be great to be able to track the movements of Biden’s inner circle and their traipsing back and forth from the White House to Obama’s command center in DC? Or Hillary Clinton’s and Nancy Pelosi’s meanderings as they continue their grifting operations?

Think about this: if a federal asset is doing the tracking, the asset may be able to turn on the surveilled person’s phone audio, camera, GPS, and even read their email/texts - all without the phone's screen coming on. This could also be used to determine if a pattern of using burner phones is detected, which is typically an indicator of illicit activity…..

The mind wanders as to the potential uses of cell phone geolocating data! And it goes way beyond tracking the Democrats’ mules.

So shall it be written; so shall it be done.

The end.