Tucker Carlson’s Naysayers Self-Identify for All to See

Democrats, Uniparty, NeverTrumpers, Deep State, pick-your-poison

The unfortunate Jacob Chansley, dubbed the “QAnon Shaman”

Tucker Carlson’s recent exposure of the Democrats’ J6 narrative as a long-running lie has rattled a lot of cages. The sound and fury from serial liars like Chuck Schumer (D-NY) on the Senate floor and Mitch McConnell (R-KY) during a press conference this week only reinforced the validity of Carlson’s reporting. After all, anyone with an ounce of critical thinking capability could see for themselves how key points of the narrative imploded while watching the incriminating video evidence presented.

While many America First Americans have long suspected the truth about the Democrat J6 hoax (which, after all, is just the latest in a series to be exposed as bald-face lies), consumers of the legacy media have bought into that narrative for the last two years and have written off dissenters as “conspiracy theorists.” Fortunately, there are a few open-minded among the normies who bought into the J6 hoax who have now had their minds dramatically changed by Carlson’s bombshell reporting.

One of those is Dr. Naomi Wolf. An excerpt from her “Dear Conservatives, I Apologize” substack post yesterday:

There is no way for anyone thoughtful, even if he or she is a lifelong Democrat, not to notice that Sen Chuck Schumer did not say to the world that the footage that Mr Carlson aired was not real. Rather, he warned that it was “shameful” for Fox to allow us to see it. The Guardian characterized Mr Carlson’s and Fox News’ sin, weirdly, as “Over-Use” of Jan 6 footage. Isn’t the press supposed to want full transparency for all public interest events?

….

Sen Mitch McConnell (R-KY), Senate minority leader, did not say the video on Fox News was fake or doctored. He said, rather, that it was “a mistake” to depart from the views of the events held by the chief of the Capitol Police. This is a statement from McConnell about orthodoxy — not a statement about a specific truth or untruth.

….

You don’t have to agree with Mr Carlson’s interpretation of the videos, to conclude that the Democrats in leadership, for their own part, have cherry-picked, hyped, spun, and in some ways appear to have lied about, aspects of January 6, turning a tragedy for the nation into a politicized talking point aimed at discrediting half of our electorate.

….

[A]nyone in leadership who misrepresented to the public the events of the day so as to distort the complexity of its actual history — must also be held accountable.

Jan 6 has become, as the DNC intended it to become, after the fact, a “third rail”; a shorthand used to dismiss or criminalize an entire population and political point of view.

Peaceful Republicans and conservatives as a whole have been demonized by the story told by Democrats in leadership of what happened that day.

….

So half of the country has been tarred by association, and is now in many quarters presumed to consist of chaotic berserkers, anti-democratic rabble, and violent upstarts, whose sole goal is the murder of our democracy.

….

The gatekeepers who lie to the public about the most consequential events of our time — and who thus damage our nation, distort our history, and deprive half of our citizenry of their right to speak, champion and choose, without being tarred as would-be violent traitors - deserve our disgust.

I am sorry the nation was damaged by so much untruth issued by those with whom I identified at the time.

Dr. Wolf is right insofar as she goes. However, she failed to complete her journey by ignoring the embedded instigators who perpetrated most of the “violence” during the J6 protest. We know better after black-clothed Antifa have been found in some of the videos on that day.

Here is my take. Tucker Carlson destroyed the J6 narrative that was created/manufactured by the Democrats' star chamber committee:

1. Despite being depicted as such by the Democrat-media echo chamber over the last two years, the “QAnon shaman” Jacob Chansley wasn't the "violent leader of the insurrection" after all. He was escorted throughout his time in the Capitol by police. He was peaceful the whole time and even offered prayers for the police at various points. He was subsequently railroaded into a plea deal when the video evidence withheld that would have exonerated him completely from the 41-month sentence he plead. And Mitch McConnell, John Thune (R-SD), Thom Tillis (R-NC), and Mike Rounds (R-SD) are apparently okay with that miscarriage of justice despite the video evidence presented by Carlson. After all, Chansley spent months in solitary confinement for, at best, a misdemeanor trespass violation! (As an example of the yellow journalism media reporting on Chansley, be sure to hit the link in the previous sentence for a typical example from 2021.)

2. The Democrats used Officer Brian Sicknick's unfortunate death as "proof" that the protestors were part of a "violent insurrection." In fact, that's where the myth of the "violent insurrection" began. Except Carlson exposed the fact that Sicknick was still alive AFTER the Democrat/media claimed he had been "killed" by protestors - first by being bludgeoned with a fire extinguisher, and then as a result of getting a dose of bear spray in the face from a protestor. He actually died from unrelated strokes days later. By the way, the only person actually killed during the protested was the unarmed Ashlii Babbitt who was shot by a cop who was never held accountable. And all of the protestors were unarmed, as later sheepishly confirmed by the FBI. So much for the “armed insurrection” myth!

3. An edited and out-of-context video clip Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO) was used by the Democrats’ J6 committee to show people "fleeing from the building in terror." Never mind that the Democrats hired a Hollywood producer to selectively edit video segments to frame the "insurrection narrative." Carlson showed that Hawley was merely the last to leave the Capitol – and that everyone had left in an orderly fashion, including Hawley.

4. Video evidence showed that Ray Epps lied to the Democrats’ J6 committee about having left the Capitol before the Capitol was breached. The video showed Epps outside the Capitol around 30 minutes after he told the committee that he had left the area. What else is he hiding?

5. The Republican senators rushed to the microphones to "condemn" Carlson's video evidence because they have supported the "violent insurrection" narrative as a means to preclude having to deal with President Trump in 2024. For example, both Rounds and Thune have been NeverTrumpers since 2016 – Thune very publicly, in particular. Rounds says that "I was there," and we (erstwhile conspiracy theorists now proven right by Tucker Carlson) weren't. That doesn't mean that they're telling the truth about what transpired, and the fact that they're apparently okay with the continued incarceration without trial of a few hundred of the protestors is unconscionable.

Finally, a classmate and former friend opines on an entirely possible scenario in the aftermath of the infirmities of various Democrat senators, as well as Mitch McConnell’s recent hospitalization after a fall:

Very little in Byzantium DC is as it seems on the surface. Most of the time, if a Byzantiumist is talking, he is lying, and often to cover up unethical or criminal dealings… or otherwise disguise agendas to which most Americans would object.

Recently, stroke victim Fetterman & age victim Feinstein went out of service with catastrophic infirmities.

And the ratio of Republicans and RINO’s to Neo-Marxists and Corruptocrats in the US Senate was thus 49/49. The latter party lost their clear advantage as an obstacle to the GOP controlled House. 

And the mood is desperate… The Obiden-Xi agenda is at stake… possibly threatened by the Republican/RINO controlled House and a resurgent, awakening populace. Much evidence of serious Democrat criminality is being exposed.

Now, suddenly it’s 48/49 in the Senate … and the Democrats/Corruptocrats have a piece of flotsam to cling to.

McConnell tripped and fell at a private dinner at the Waldorf-Astoria (!) and is in the hospital … we are told.

Suspiciously few details are forthcoming and suspiciously little curiosity apparent from the lamestream media.

Schumer said he McConnell and spoke to his staff. He did not say he spoke to McConnell. It’s pretty clear he did not.

Am I the only one reminded of when the mob’s chief lobbyist, Senator Harry Reid (D. Great State of Gambling, Prostitution and Money Laundering) tripped and fell in his bathroom (with no witnesses) and days later reappeared looking like he had been beaten up? (Because he almost certainly had been beaten up!) 

And that pretty much presaged the end of the Evil Harry Reid. He was never the same after that and steadily faded from the scene.

If I were a journalist, or an honest cop with jurisdiction, or an honest FBI Director, I’d be asking questions:

Who was at the “private dinner” at the Waldorf Astoria? Names, citizenship, residency, professions. 

Who paid for the dinner?

What specifically, was/were the topic/s of conversation? Was it harmonious? Were any demands/requests made regarding business before or potentially before the Senate, any disagreements voiced, anger displayed?

Who was with Senator MConnell, when he “tripped and fell”?

Who witnessed it?

Where exactly did it occur - the exact spot?

How did he “trip” and over what?

How exactly did he suffer a concussion? Where did he hit his head? On what?Show me!

What are ALL of his injuries? Any other contusions, lacerations, etc.?

What facility is he in? Who are his doctors?

What medical procedures have been performed? 

What are his current, detailed condition and prognosis? Is he lucid? Is he able to talk? Write? 

Who is with him in the hospital?

What kind of security is provided?

This important development – losing the Minority Leader to a blow to his head – with its potentially far reaching consequences for the nation, should not be ignored, dismissed, or hidden from complete exposure.

Is my friend’s speculation just a conspiracy theory, or will time prove him to be right? In any event, the naysayers about Tucker Carlson’s revelations have exposed themselves for what many of us always knew them to be: Democrats, Uniparty, RINOs, NeverTrumpers, Deep State, stenographers in the media, gaslighters, and/or propagandists. And that observation is decidedly not a “conspiracy”!

The end.