2020 Election Integrity Lies Exposed

Despite legacy media claims to the contrary, election fraud in 2020 was massive, pervasive, and well-documented

Throughout the past year-plus, credible reports of election fraud during the 2020 election continued to surface in independent and alternative media, which slowly seeped into the public consciousness and eroded faith in the integrity of US elections. Meanwhile, the Democrat Party and their allies in the legacy media settled on a two-point narrative that has been endlessly repeated for over a year: (1) the 2020 election was “the most secure ever,” and (2) there is no basis for claims of widespread election fraud sufficient to have changed the election outcome.

Which is correct? Was there massive election fraud during the 2020 election or not? The purpose of this analysis is to examine facts, analyses, and media misreporting and under-reporting in support of the above two-point narrative.

Several recent news reports triggered this analysis, including the following:

Wisconsin. The Wisconsin Assembly Committee on Campaigns and Elections convened a public hearing on December 9 in Madison to discuss the integrity of the state’s voter rolls. As covered live by OANN and reported via various social media (short videos available here, here, here, here, and here), these are some of the facts that were presented:

• There are over 7 million individual voter records despite an eligible voter population of approximately 4.5 million people.

• 157,000 voters have the same registration number.

• Wisconsin has 119,283 "active voters" who have been registered for over 100 years.

• The number of over 100-year-olds expands to 500,000 when in inactive voters are included.

• There are 42,000 voters in Wisconsin who are currently listed as inactive in the August 2021 file, but nevertheless voted in November 2020. This number is twice Joe Biden’s margin of victory in Wisconsin.

  • The election rolls were inflated before the 2020 election to create phantom voters (from false voter registration lists such as identified above) which were used to determine the outcome of the election.

• The fraud was perpetrated through manipulation of the voter registration rolls, per election expert Dr. Douglas Frank. Voter registration lists were manipulated through an application program interface (app) using census data. Mark Zuckerberg’s Center for Tech and Civic Life used census data during the 2020 election.

Arizona. At a Pima County Election Integrity Hearing, a whistleblower’s letter was read into the record that claimed “a Democrat plot to illegally add approximately 35,000 votes to each Democratic candidate’s vote total on the county, state, and federal levels by means of tampering with automated ballot counting machines.” In addition, canvassing results in several precincts determined that more ballots were cast in some precincts than there were people legally registered to vote, and “that 45% of the people surveyed did not know the person that voted from their address.” This hearing, of course, was a follow-on to the Maricopa County forensic audit report, with some numerical highlights from the senate hearing held on 15 July that summarized the analysis provided below (as taken from the hearing video here):

• 11,326 people who voted were not on the November 7 voter rolls but were somehow listed in the December 4 database.

• 3,981 people who voted on Election Day were registered after October 15, which is a violation of Arizona state law.

• ~18,000 people voted on Election Day but were subsequently removed from the rolls. [Note: this is the same phantom voter methodology used in Wisconsin as discussed above.]

• 74,243 mail-in ballots were counted with no clear record of having been mailed out in the first place.

• For context purposes, the Biden margin of victory in Arizona was 10,457 votes, per the State of Arizona’s Official Canvass.

Pennsylvania. Political theater continued surrounding a Republican-initiated forensic audit authorized by the Senate Intergovernmental Operations Committee. In the latest episode, Democrat Attorney General Josh Shapiro complained in a December 8 brief to a Commonwealth Court, which is aimed at halting the audit, that the contractor picked by Republicans for the audit “can’t be trusted to be the ‘non-partisan’ reviewer the Senate GOP claims it is, nor can it safely store private data on millions of voters.” The hearings continued on December 15, with Senate President Pro Tempore Jake Corman (R) presenting a briefing to the court in support of the audit. It should be noted that not a single Democrat elected official at the state or federal level in any state has supported any full forensic audits of the 2020 election results in any state, county, or municipal jurisdiction in the US as a means to confirm that the election indeed was “the most secure in US political history.” This is despite a nationwide Rasmussen poll back in June that determined that 55% of voters support election audits.

Georgia. Immediately after the 2020 election, a “Risk-Limiting Audit” in the form of a hand-recount of Fulton County’s mail-in ballots was conducted by the Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger that “confirmed” Joe Biden’s 12,284-vote margin of victory. On November 17 of this year, Governor Kemp’s office released an official letter confirming a list of 36 allegations of election irregularities in that hand-recount discovered by through independent analysis of ballot images and tally sheets that had previously been excused and rejected by the Secretary of State’s office. In Fulton County alone, voter tally sheets for approximately 275,000 ballots cast were found to be missing, which completely invalidates the hand recount. This has gone unreported upon by major US media.

Another “baseless” allegation. As noted above, a main part of the Democrat political narrative continually repeated by media allies since November 2020 has been that any claims of significant election fraud are “baseless.” A corollary narrative involves referring to any such claims as “conspiracy theories.” Examples abound (emphasis added below):

• A headline from NPR on November 10, 2020: “Pompeo Fuels Administration's Baseless Claims Of Election Fraud”

• A headline from yahoo!news on November 13, 2020: “What’s the real purpose of Trump’s baseless voter fraud claims?”

• A headline from the Associated Press on December 24, 2020: “Senate hearing elevates baseless claims of election fraud”

• A headline from NBC News on January 23, 2021: “Trump considered naming new AG to help push baseless claims of voter fraud”

• The headline from a CNN article on July 18, 2021 that purports to “fact-check” the results of Arizona’s forensic audit summarized above: “Fact check: Arizona audit chief baselessly raises suspicion about 74,000 ballots”

• A headline from The New York Times on September 21, 2021: “Trump Campaign Knew Lawyers’ Voting Machine Claims Were Baseless, Memo Shows”

• A headline from The Washington Post on November 1, 2021: ‘Baseless fraud claims are hurting election security in this Michigan town.” And from the article itself: “… conspiracy theories from Trump … and “… when local election officials buy into baseless conspiracy theories …” (the latter being a double-whammy).

The word “baseless” continues to have been used by many in the media even after the shocking results from the Maricopa County forensic audit. It should also be noted that all of the above articles – and many others from the legacy media over the past year – are extremely light on analysis and investigation, with zero quotes from the myriad of independent analyses, reports, and under-oath testimonies from independent election experts and renowned statisticians who actually analyzed publicly available voter registration data and time-series voter data from counties across the nation.

And there is a large body of such evidence that dispels any claims that the 2020 election was “the most secure in history” and that any claims of massive election fraud are “baseless.” Here are just a few examples available online for inspection.

The WIMP Vote Anomalies. WIMP stands for “Write-In and Minority Party.” Every state has them in every election. An important study by retired DoD analyst Ray Behar concluded that vote tabulation anomalies that he uncovered in Pennsylvania “are not a matter of chance and are almost certainly the result of systematic vote shifting” (stealing) of WIMP votes cast through ballot adjudication.” First of all, Blehar found that the total number of WIMP votes cast in Pennsylvania declined by ~113,000 votes from 2016 to 2020. This is highly unlikely given the massive number of mail-in ballots cast in 2020 compared to previous elections, especially given the COVID lockdowns. Secondly, the WIMP votes cast for president normally exceed or are generally equivalent to down-ballots cast for state-wide offices such as attorney general and secretary of state. However, in Pennsylvania in 2020, the Libertarian presidential candidate received over 20,000 less votes than down-ballot Libertarian candidates while the Green Party presidential candidate received over 34,000 less votes than down-ballot Green candidates. Blehar also found that President Trump received more provisional votes than all other GOP candidates in Pennsylvania but lost by 64,492 votes to the Auditor General candidate (!) in mail-in votes – a virtually impossible statistical anomaly. He further concludes that vote-shifting of WIMP ballots also took place in Arizona, Wisconsin, and Georgia because those states each had a near-zero number of WIMP ballots cast – a major red flag compared to past elections.

Pennsylvania Anomalies. Immediately after the election, an independent technical team led by Mensa physicist John Droz, Jr., was formed to conduct a statistical analysis of certain voter data in key states in order to determine whether there were any significant statistical anomalies evident. The objective was to help ascertain that all legal votes — and only legal votes, were counted. The team consisted of five statistics experts who were sympathetic to that objective. There were two important conclusions made in the report. Joe Biden’s vote totals in the four Pennsylvania counties that clearly indicated statistical anomalies – three of which were Republican-leaning – were 1.24 to 1.43 times greater than the totals for Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama in prior elections. Also, there were ten Pennsylvania counties in which Biden received excess votes above the Democrat totals in three prior presidential elections. Highly unusual given that Biden rarely campaigned in public in the last weeks of the election campaign, and when he did make a public appearance, the turnout was miniscule in comparison to Trump’s rallies!

Michigan Anomalies. Droz’s team also conducted a statistical analysis of Michigan votes cast. They found that the time series plots of election data in two Michigan counties showed that the 2020 Biden and Trump plots tracked at almost exactly the same proportionality—a statistical impossibility without direct data manipulation (i.e., machine manipulation of vote totals). From the report’s conclusion: “[There] is very strong evidence that the absentee voting counts in some counties in Michigan have likely been manipulated by a computer algorithm. The comparison of the 2020 results to the normal 2016 election data is dramatic. If no other plausible explanation can be made for these unexpected findings, it appears that this computer software was installed sometime after the 2016 Presidential election. On the surface, it would seem that the tabulating equipment in infected precincts has been programmed to shift a percentage of absentee votes from Trump to Biden.”

Arizona Anomalies. Well before the Maricopa County forensic audit results were reported out, retired DoD analyst Ray Blehar completed a top-level analysis of the Maricopa County election data. From publicly available election data, Blehar found that two massive vote dumps occurred in just over an hour after the Arizona polls closed totally ~625,000 and ~1,473,000 votes, respectively. The total of those two vote dumps (2,098,619) exceeded the official results total of Maricopa County votes cast (2,089,563) by more than 9,000 votes. Biden received more votes in those two vote dumps (1,161,582) than the official vote tally (1,040,774) in Maricopa County. Those dumps could only have been absentee ballot early voting results that were counted legally in the two weeks before Election Day, as late-arriving absentee ballots and election day in-person voting results could not possibly have been included in those two dumps uploaded just over an hour after the polls closed. The two vote dumps were time-stamped, making it impossible that the ballots came from any county other than Maricopa, as no other Arizona county delivered more than 525,000 votes, and any two or more counties necessary to contribute to either of those dumps would have had to time their uploads down to the second (an impossibility). Blehar also determined that in-person voting in Maricopa County on Election Day totaled 167,000 votes cast, per multiple sources (here and here). It is unclear how those in-person votes were accounted for when the two early voter dumps identified above already exceeded the official number of votes cast in the county. Blehar also found that the 2020 Biden victory margin was less than the decline in write-in votes from 2016; Biden won the state by approximately 12,000 votes while the number of write-in votes declined by nearly 17,000 (which is highly suspicious). Lastly, in a county in which there are over 100,000 more registered Republicans than Democrats, Blehar found that exit polling and post mortem analysis made Biden’s ~249,000 vote margin in Maricopa County highly suspect. Anomalies indeed!

Other Resources for Election Fraud Analyses, Reports, Testimony, and Information. While the above provide ample evidence of anomalies and actual fraud requiring further investigations by state legislatures, there are a plethora of other on-line resources available for any intrepid and erstwhile investigative reporters in the legacy media interested in reporting election integrity facts that have been uncovered since November 3, 2020. Here are some of them:

• US 2020 Election Fraud at a Glance, a website that summarizes “the allegations of fraud, as presented in governmental hearings, courts, and investigative reports, by state, to provide an easy reference and portal for further research.” Among a plethora of other information and links to other websites, for the key swing states, this website summarizes the number of disputed ballots, Biden's winning margin, the Electoral college votes under dispute, whether a forensic audit is being conducted, and other valuable state-specific information at-a-glance.

• Here is the Evidence, which is a crowdsourcing tool and database for organizing election anomalies and legal issues

• Statistical analyst Seth Keshel’s heat maps and supporting commentary based on analysis of voter registration trends

• Dr. Douglas Frank’s election analyses, including machine manipulation of voter registration databases and “ghost voters”

• The 25 thoroughly-researched and scientifically-approached reports from John Droz’s team, including:

o   The Nevada Report by attorney Jesse Binnall.

o   Three reports by Peter Navarro: Immaculate Deception, Art of the Steal and The Case, Evidence, etc.

o   A study about absentee ballots by Dr. John Lott.

o   Steve Cortes: The Statistical Case Against Biden’s Win.

o   Voter Registration Trends by Seth Keshel.

o   A video as to why vote recounts do not resolve some types of fraud.

o   A lawyer’s inside report about what transpired in Wisconsin.

o   2020 Election Irregularities (details on four categories)

o   The Antrim Michigan Forensics Report

o   Evidence of Fraud in Conjunction with Use of Dominion BMD Machines.

o   The Small World of Voting Machine Certification

o   Voting Machines

o   There is no Reliable Way to Detect Hacked Ballot-Marking Devices

o   Can Voters Detect Malicious Manipulation of Ballot Marking Devices?

Chaser. Lastly, courtesy of Telegram channel Liberty Overwatch, a glimpse of the forthcoming movie detailing election fraud uncovered by TrueTheVote.org and others is provided below:

Filmmaker Dinesh D’Souza just released a trailer for a documentary that exposes “2000 mules” who delivered fraudulent ballots in key swing states during the 2020 election. True the Vote has compiled evidence of organized ballot tracking in 6 states, Georgia, Arizona, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, and Texas. In Georgia for example, True the Vote alleges there were 242 traffickers who made 5,662 trips to ballot drop boxes between the early morning hours of 12AM and 5AM, potentially unloading hundreds of thousands of illegally harvested ballots over the course of several weeks.

Can’t wait to watch that blockbuster! The illegitimate Biden regime, the Democrats in general, and their media sycophants must be sweating bullets.

Conclusion. Contrary to the Democrat Party narratives as echoed by their legacy media allies, there is an enormous body of evidence pointing to massive unexplained anomalies and election fraud during the 2020 election. None of these analyses, reports, and supporting commentary have been examined in any detail whatsoever by legacy media “investigative reporters” and editorialists. One of the legacy media’s few attempts to actually analyze (after a fashion) – and ostensibly “debunk” claims of widespread election fraud – was reported out by the Associated Press on December 14. Their analysis examined “voter fraud cases in the six political battleground states where former President Donald Trump and his allies disputed his loss to Democrat Joe Biden” and concluded that the number of instances of fraud by individuals investigated/prosecuted is insufficient to overcome Joe Biden’s margins of victory in any of the states examined. Retired DoD analyst Ray Blehar was quick to point out the logical fallacy in the AP’s argument: “Counting arrests and prosecutions for voter fraud as a means of determining the total amount of fraud is analogous to counting the number of speeding tickets to determine the number of people who drive above the speed limit.” And that about sums up the totality of the legacy media’s reporting on 2020 election integrity.

The end.